LeBron Trade
Obviously LeBron James should never be traded. But i do ponder what would be the best possible deal we could get for him? if we were to trade him we could should get at least 3 All-Star caliber players and tons of picks. so what is your opinion on a hypethetical Lebron trade? Please comment your possible trade candidates. I believe the best trade would be a 3way trade. We would have to get a cornerstone player in the deal so rule out all teams with no MVP caliber players.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on FearTheSword.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff at FearTheSword
0 recs |
98 comments
Comments
Every other first round pick for the next 30 years (since you can’t trade away consecutive first rounders) is a start. You also have to consider the huge drop in value that the franchise probably will take by losing Lebron so that might not be enough to get it done
by Roger Dorn on Jun 18, 2009 1:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
think you can only trade up to 3 1st rounders at a time.
by homer simpson on Jul 1, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given that LeBron would make the max next year should we resign him and that there is no one player in the league that can match his skill level and age value, there is literally no reasonable return we could get for a LeBron trade. Even if we got Wade, Paul and Kobe, well, we’d be paying Wade, Paul and Kobe all of their salaries which is impossible.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 18, 2009 2:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If some team was actually going to give real value for him
and no team will for a rental player, he’d be worth first round draft picks…which would not cost the same as a Kobe/Wade or Paul.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 18, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
like…10 first round draft picks, right? you can’t seriously mean that we should trade LeBron for some first round picks?
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 18, 2009 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are you talking about?
He said that we couldn’t get value for Lebron without it costing us as much in money. If we got a teams 1st round picks for the next 3 years and their 2nd round picks for the following 2, we would get pretty good value (not the greatest player in the league, of course) and it wouldn’t cost us max money.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 19, 2009 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn't resign this summer, they will have to consider trading him
but the problem is, they won’t get anything back for him…or at the very least, not much. The problem is that any team that trades for Lebron knows they are doing so with him bolting at the end of the year for New York or Miami.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 18, 2009 3:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn’t resign this summer, they will have to consider trading him
blatantly false. if he doesn’t resign this summer, the cavs still know that he’s much more likely than not to re-up w/ cleveland in ‘10, for all of the reasons that we’ve all seen around here hundreds of times. there will be no escalation in trade consideration if he doesn’t sign this summer…it is and will stay at zero.
and…miami??
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 18, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is not blatantly false
The Cavs will be left standing with absolutely nothing if they do not resign him this off-season. If Lebron hits free agency, even though the Cavs can offer him more than anyone else, even though they’ve brought in Chinese investors to market him in their country, etc. He will leave via free-agency if he reaches it.
And Miami will be in the same position the Cavs are in: They can resign their superstar and have the cap freedom to bring in another. Lebron and Wade are very close.
I don’t want to see Lebron leave but if he’s staying with Cleveland, he’d resign this off-season and stop the drama. He’d get MORE money sooner and be out of his contract with Cleveland years from now SOONER.
Only reason you don’t resign is if you don’t think the team is going to make moves to stay competitive. And if they aren’t doing that this off-season, it’ll be too late by the time free agency hits next off-season.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 18, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are so wrong it’s painful. not extending this summer means nothing with respect to LeBron’s future intentions with the cavs. zero.
not extending allows him to do 2 things: 1. capitalize on what promises to be the biggest media frenzy any of us has ever seen leading into the summer of ’10, raising an already unthinkably high profile; and 2. keep the pressure on gilbert/ferry/brown to “make moves to stay competitive” (quoting you) and not get complacent.
if he extends (not re-signs, he’s already under contract) this summer, then what leverage does he have to ensure that the cavs won’t go sell off mo, delonte, boobie and the rest to save payroll? how can he be sure they’ll be vigilant in pursuing championship-level talent?
even if he hits free agency, he will resign with the cavs. he knows that, the cavs know that, it’s a matter of exercising leverage. he ain’t going anywhere. and what you DEFINITELY can’t do is decide to trade him b/c of his actions in the summer of ’09. you instantly and immediately eliminate any ability you may have had to keep him on the cavs. i think everyone here would rather the be left standing with nothing, knowing the cavs did absolutely everything they could to keep LeBron in cleveland. trading him would be epically stupid.
and let me go on the record…i think he’ll extend this summer.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 18, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What leverage does he have?
What leverage does he have next summer after he signs? He’s not going to have any leverage once he signs that contract, whether it is this summer or next.
If he really thinks that the difference between the team keeping Mo and dealing Mo is 2009 and 2010, then his decision is already made. The team won’t be competive in his mind unless he constantly holds them hostage.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 19, 2009 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, LeBron maintains massive leverage as long as he doesn’t sign, which will hopefully encourage the cavs to make some big signings around him in order to entice him to stay. at some point, though, he has to sign w/ someone, somewhere, at which time his leverage is probably diminished, but he still reigns as the best player in the game, which is pretty significant leverage in its own right.
in any event, there is just zero chance that the cavs would or should consider trading him. they remain the odds-on favorites to resign him, why would they mess with that?
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 19, 2009 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don'TCallMeJoey = Lebron James?
even if he hits free agency, he will resign with the cavs. he knows that, the cavs know that, it’s a matter of exercising leverage. he ain’t going anywhere.
Are you Lebron James? Do you know exactly what he’s going to do? No. You only HOPE that it’s 100% that he WILL resign with the Cavs next offseason. You back this up with this statement:
and let me go on the record…i think he’ll extend this summer.
by tandur on Jun 23, 2009 1:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is not true at all that LeBron is guarenteed to leave if he reaches free agency next year. I have no idea why you would say that. I highly doubt that LeBron resigns this summer. It’s in his interest to keep pressure on the Cavs to make moves to keep the team a championship contender. He wants to keep the leverage, so he has no reason to sign an extension this summer.
That being said, I still think he’ll sign an extension next summer and stay in Cleveland. He’s never said anything that would give the indication that he wants to leave.
But there is absolutely no way the Cavs would trade him next year. None. Never would happen. First of all, they’ll be contending for a championship next year and they’ll need him. Secondly, there is no way they could get fair return for him if they did trade him. Third, they’re going to resign him anyways so why would they need to trade him? This would never, ever happen.
by Buckeye Brad on Jun 18, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Miami will be in the same position the Cavs are in: They can resign their superstar and have the cap freedom to bring in another. Lebron and Wade are very close.
Why, after writing this paragraph, don’t you consider the fact that maybe D-Wade would, ya know, come to Cleveland?
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 19, 2009 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
South Beach>Lake Erie.
Hey man I got a super nintendo(Lake Erie) come to my house and play.
Uh Dude I have a PS3, I really think you should come to my house.
Some people swear they down as can be
Turns out those same Homies Sit down to pee
by I blocked Patrick Chewing on Jun 20, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, not sure if you know about this, but with the advent of commercial airlines, you can fly anywhere you want! Especially if you have unlimited money! No self-respecting superstar would want to play in Miami.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 20, 2009 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except the on we are talking about does
And has ring to show for it.
All I am saying is I have Been to South Beach and I have been to Cleavland.
geez….
Bitter much?
Some people swear they down as can be
Turns out those same Homies Sit down to pee
by I blocked Patrick Chewing on Jun 20, 2009 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
based on what?
I’d say the number of self-respecting superstars who wouldn’t want to play in Cleveland, regardless of the presence of Lebron James, far outnumbers the amount who don’t want to play in Miami.
But then again, I have no facts either. So I guess we’re both just talking out of our asses?
by tandur on Jun 23, 2009 1:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of us certainly is
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 23, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
atleast you admit it
I’m just trying to show your your illogical logic.
by tandur on Jun 29, 2009 2:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Location means nothing nowadays. It is much easier for Wade to come to Cleveland than it is for LBJ to leave his hometown. And considering there’s a better team in Cleveland, well, the decision is obvious.
by gahnki on Jun 22, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather play SNES than PS3.
I'm not really into Song of Hiawatha.
by sarcasmdave on Jun 25, 2009 2:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I’d rather have LeBron James, Chris Bosh, and Mo Wiliams in 2010.
2009 Prediction: Att - Yds - TD
Jerome Harrison 95 - 532 - 8
by Simmsinns on Jun 20, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You just might be able to pry Kobe Bryant from the Lakers if you offered them LeBron ;-)
"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler
by lrh86 on Jun 18, 2009 3:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"might"?
if they didnt jump at the chance theyd be crazy, they are very close in overall talent, half the basketball world thinks one is the best player in the world, half thinks the other is, the difference is lebron is 6 years younger, the lakers would be trading someone who any year now will start declining from the top of his mountain for one who hasnt even reached his peak, they should trade kobe + picks = lebron
by CavsLebronFan on Jun 19, 2009 5:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To Funny....
This is probably the funniest thing I have read on here… Sure Lebron is a good player, but only time will tell if he reaches Kobe’s level… Everyone and their mom was so eager to make him out to be more than what he is….. His game needs to develope more befoe people start to compare him to Kobe or anyone else of that caliber……
by What_happened_Cleveland on Jun 25, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and it’s not really all that close
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Indeed
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 25, 2009 7:11 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Kobe is still better than LeBron. As soon as LeBron developes his fundamentals to half the point that Kobe has he will become the better player. It just hasn’t happened yet. Bullrushing the lane and getting a bailout whistle is not basketball skill. A couple more years and I think he will be able to claim the best player in the game status. Heck, maybe even this year.
by lrh86 on Jun 25, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LeBron is good enough to play through his fundamental deficiencies and still be better than Kobe.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 25, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this doesn’t mean anything:
As soon as LeBron developes his fundamentals to half the point that Kobe has he will become the better player
and this is a cheap, inaccurate criticism of LeBron that people who clearly know little about basketball or LeBron’s game float:
Bullrushing the lane and getting a bailout whistle is not basketball skill
you’re telling me that kobe gets fewer superstar calls than LeBron? that’s patently absurd.
in every statistical category, LeBron is superior to kobe, except maybe FT%. every one. i’m not sure what you use to measure quality of a player — some combination of “fundamentals”, whatever that means, and rings, i’m sure — but by all of the traditional metrics, LeBron is the better player.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turkmenbashi has got it. There is no reason (none) to trade him at any point while under contract. There is no single player/contract that is more valuable than him/his.
by hans on Jun 18, 2009 5:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Roy, Lamarcus Aldridge, Rudy Fernandez, and one Joel Pryzbilla this years first round pick 3 second round picks, 2011 first round pick, and the rights to petire kaponen and joel freeland for your Lebron James.... make it so.
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
by faith on Jun 19, 2009 12:52 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Switch Rudy out of that deal and include Outlaw and you have a deal I would make
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on Jul 13, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if i had to (and i only would with a gun to my head) id trade him for oklahoma’s core guys (durant etc) or portland’s core (roy etc), i see those two teams being contenders in a couple years if they keep their players together, so they would be the best long term value but even then we wouldnt be getting a fair deal
by CavsLebronFan on Jun 19, 2009 5:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That would be the only reasonable trade IF you had to make one. You’d have to get the equivalent of an entire starting lineup to match his ability. But then you have to pay those guys too.
Cavs can’t trade him at all.
by gahnki on Jun 22, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is a pretty significant grit deficit on this cavs team…
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 19, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty much everything that can be said about this topic has been said already it seems. So just for the fun of it, I’m going to pretend that there are no contracts or salary cap, and try and come up with a trade based on value alone. (No draft picks, that’s boring). I might just accept this four way trade: LeBron James for Chris Paul, Dwyane Wade, and Yao Ming.
Cavaliers
GAIN: Chris Paul, Dwyane Wade, Yao Ming
LOST: LeBron James, Mo Williams, Delonte West, Anderson Varajao, Zydrunas Ilgauskas
Hornets
GAIN: LeBron James
LOST: Chris Paul, David West, Peja Stojakovic, Rasual Butler
Rockets
GAIN: Michael Beasley, Peja Stojakovic, Anderson Varajao, Zydrunas Ilgauskas
LOST: Yao Ming
Heat
GAIN: David West, Mo Williams, Delonte West, Rasual Butler
LOST: Dwyane Wade, Michael Beasley
Go Quinn, Go! (greatest QB in the sport, ever)
by Simmsinns on Jun 20, 2009 10:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, the Heat really get hosed in that deal
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 20, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Rockets and the Heat definitely got the short end of the stick, but in a deal of this magnitude it’s bound to happen. David West and Mo Williams are still all-stars though, that has to amount for something.
Go Quinn, Go! (greatest QB in the sport, ever)
by Simmsinns on Jun 20, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mo Williams and David West
Were just barely all-stars this year. If Mo Williams wasnt with Lebron then he wouldnt have been an all-star and to this day im still trying to figure out how David West got picked over Carmelo Anthony.
by lj15 on Jun 22, 2009 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the rockets wouldn't trade yao
for someone who has twice the wear and tear(ilgauskas). Although your trade propasition was well thought out
by mutombo4life on Jun 20, 2009 1:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Rockets would love to trade Yao
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on Jul 13, 2009 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
trade him for Scola
This trade would make sense because Scola will soon have 2 or 3 championship rings and I want those rings and Scola in Cleveland
by djsmadrid on Jun 20, 2009 9:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the Cavs should trade LBJ for David Stern since no one team has a player
equal to Lebron ….
Stern could, call the Refs and ensure a 73+ win season and a championship.
Stern > LBJ
man up!
by exult463 on Jun 22, 2009 11:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m starting to think Stern needs LBJ just as much LBJ needs basketball.
2009 Prediction: Att - Yds - TD
Jerome Harrison 95 - 532 - 8
by Simmsinns on Jun 22, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tell you what
Stern is wanting Lebron to go so bad his antics in the draft didn,t fool me one bit…..he was pissed off because Cleveland didnt waste time or unessesary monies on a ROOKIE that had nothing to bring to the table what it boils down to…what he had the pause for 5 mins before going to podium then rolls his eyes when walking on to the stage he’s what I like to call a HATER not to mention a schemer.
by BUCKEYE NATION on Jun 26, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LA Laker Fan
If LeBron is better than Kobe, than where oh where are the rings? Where the jewelry at, player? Right now LeBron is the new George Gervin; looks good on the poster – and NO JEWELRY; NO BLING, NO RING, NO DINGALING. bahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
by jakethesnake66 on Jun 25, 2009 10:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
LeBron has the same number of rings that Jordan had at this point of his career. Kobe has played in the NBA much longer than LeBron so it’s not really fair to compare them based on that criteria. You can do that when both of their careers are complete.
To compare Kobe and LeBron right now you have to look at the stats, and LeBron is clearly the best player in the NBA using any statistical measure. And it’s not even close.
by Buckeye Brad on Jun 25, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rationality won’t work.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 25, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Classic dumbass response to the debate.
Ride on ye fearsome Horsemen of the Basketball Apocalypse. We got this.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 25, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As stupid and moronic as his reply was...
If LeBron doesn’t win the title he will not be remembered as better than Kobe. The chances that LeBron wins a title are pretty good but there is few superstars that never did win the title.
by lrh86 on Jun 25, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is way, way too early in LeBron’s career to worry about that.
by Buckeye Brad on Jun 25, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, but it can’t be a good argument until 2025 or so, so what’s the point?
by Browns8XChamps on Jun 25, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point is...
Don’t freakin coronate the guy as the “king of the NBA” until he has actually won something. I understand that Cavs fans need something to believe in but chill out on the nut licking.
by lrh86 on Jun 25, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what a ridiculous comment. he’s the best player in the NBA, and last year his team had the best record in the NBA. a little adulation is to be expected. it’s not like we’re building up an over-hyped role player like lamarcus aldridge…oh, wait, is that a blazers symbol in your avatar? my bad…
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You want to talk about over-hyped role players?
What about Mo Williams. He is easily the most overrated and over hyped all star. The only reason he was even an all star is two players were injured and LeBron cried to the media like the whiner he is. Whats he going to guarentee next?
by lrh86 on Jun 25, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
talk about distracting from the (horrible) point at hand. this has nothing to do with mo williams, and it has nothing to do with lamarcus aldridge (i was taking a purposeful cheap shot at you, obviously).
you essentially said that LeBron is undeserving of the adulation/praise he gets…you are absolutely wrong.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For sure he deserves some praise but...
When I turn on Sportscenter or log on to espn.com and all the news coverage is LeBron, LeBron, LeBron, and guess what, more LeBron it gets a little freakin old.
Also I hear way too many Cleveland fans annointing him as the greatest player to play the game when he isn’t even the best player in the NBA right now.
by lrh86 on Jun 25, 2009 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he is definitely the best player in the NBA right now. it’s actually not close.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
Lamar Odom is god’s gift to basketball according to some espn analysts. And I agree Lamar Odom is the best player in basketball right now hands down. No one else even comes close. The fact he has to play behind Kobe is an outrage. Mark My Words next year….Lamar Odom MVP of the NBA.
by Cavs4 life on Jul 5, 2009 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1. ESPN is dumb, don’t watch them.
2. LeBron is definately the best player in the NBA right now. Any statistical measure will tell you that. It’s not just Cleveland fans saying that, it’s all NBA fan who know what they’re talking about.
by Buckeye Brad on Jun 25, 2009 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
1. ESPN is dumb, don’t watch them.
REC
by DontCallMeJoey on Jun 25, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
cleveland’s offense relies on lebron, the offense is beneficial to him because it helps him get more rebounds, more assists, and well points he’d get on any other offense too.
the lakers offense doesn’t rely on one individual to get “his” stats. for the triangle to work properly no person should get more than 5-6 assists.
more assists dont necessarily mean someone is a better passer.
more rebounds dont necessarily mean someone is a better rebounder.
more points doesnt necessarily mean someone is a better scorer.
by shoothoop on Jul 7, 2009 3:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are dead-up wrong about both the cleveland and la offense. just way way off on each front.
you are right, however, about the stats that you cite, but to assume that those are the only stats people watch when they judge players is aggressively incorrect.
just to be clear, though…are you telling us we should ignore the numbers and trust your observations?
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 7, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about PER? That takes everything in to account, including the offense you play in, and LeBron dominates Kobe (and everyone else) in that stat.
There are many more advanced stats — besides points, rebounds, and assists — and every one says LeBron is the best player in the NBA by a wide margin.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 7, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I got to agree with stalin
Lebron best not even close, look the stats
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on Jul 13, 2009 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he’s clearly the best player in the NBA right now by any statistical measure. Winning championships is a team accomplishment, not an individual one. That says nothing about LeBron’s value as a player.
by Buckeye Brad on Jun 25, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes you are stupid and moronic( is that a portland word)
Again it amazes me how simple minded people are that a ring makes you a better player. Your stats show how good of a player you are. Thats saying Iverson is less of a great player because there is no ring. Or that Miller back in the 90’s did not dominate. Bryant lovers use the ring thing as justifications because his play does not. Stats bro, stats. And its not some fans in Cleveland. Lebron is worldwide known as he should be as the best player right now. And moe had better numbers than afew all-stars picked, thats why he was picked. Do some research before you post a (Moronic) comment.
by philip e on Jul 5, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take LeBrons nuts out of your mouth dude...
maybe then you’ll be able to make a rational comment.
by lrh86 on Jul 6, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure you are from LA and not say Staten Island or Long Island?
by Roger Dorn on Jun 26, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also did you really give credit to Kobe of the first 3 rings
Shaq was averaging 38 pt and 17 rebounds in the finals those three years. Kobe under 20 pts.
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on Jul 13, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lebron trade
cavs do a three team trade, cavs, lakers, heat add delonte west to the deal and get dwayne wade, pau gasol, luke walton plus first round picks from both teams.
by liggins on Jul 2, 2009 5:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
lebron trade
we get wade, gasol and 2 first round picks!?!? No player would ever get that value, not even if babe ruth came back in his prime. Why would the lakers give up Gasol in his prime? Or the heat give up wade and a first round pick? Wade was injured but is comparable to bryant and Lebron. That is a fantacy basketball trade.
by philip e on Jul 5, 2009 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 team trade for lebron
Cleveland: ships lebron and a 1st round pick to the heat and ships Z’s expiring contract to the lakers
Miami: ships D-wade to cavs and ships Beasely plus Oneal’s expiring contract to lakers
LA: ships Gasol and Odom to cavs
Cleveland:
Lose- Lebron and Z
Gain- Wade, Gasol and Odom
Miami:
Lose- Wade, Beasely and Oneal
Gain- Lebron and a 1st rounder
Lakers:
Lose- Gasol and Odom
Gain- Z, Oneal and Beasely
by Cavs4 life on Jul 5, 2009 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lakers get absolutely robbed in that trade
by lrh86 on Jul 6, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The whole point of this post was to discuss possible trades(not probable) so if someone is going to post a trade option and it is critiqued, don’t get all pissy.
by lrh86 on Jul 6, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LeBron trade is inconceivable
the cavs would never be able to trade LEBRON, its impossible. I’m a knicks fan, and I dont expect him to come to New York. The value of lebron is so great, that if you had to trade between two teams, then they would both be completely wrecked. Lets just think about this. Say the cavs and heat traded dwade, udonis haslem, jermaine oneal, and 1st nd 2nd round pick for lebron…The heat would be left with nobody and the cavs would have no chemestry. It would help neither team because one team would be loosing everything and the other team would be loosing LeBron. Even if they had to ttrade, it would have to be right now because the team would want lebron for a year before they had to resign him. And with getting shaq, it eleminates all posibilities of a trade.
by TheSportsGuru1 on Jul 3, 2009 8:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
LeBron Trade.
Don’t worry, The Cavs won’t trade LeBron, he will walk in 2010, and I don’t blame him. Look what’s around him, a washed – up Shag, Andy – Flip – Flop Varejao, Big “Z” that can’t run or jump, Walley to Slow Air – Ball and Moe – Play – Off, Choke Williams.
by blacksilkys on Jul 3, 2009 7:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
do you know this little about everything in your life? or do you just specializing in being completely clueless about hoops?
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 6, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he’s got it all right. Except for the LeBron walking part. I don’t think he would just walk out on Cleveland, but I have been wrong before…
by lrh86 on Jul 6, 2009 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, the LeBron walking part was kind of his entire point, so being wrong about that would be a big knock against this post.
other wrong-ness: “washed-up Shag”, i assume he means shaq, and the man was 3rd team all-nba last year, so washed-up would be incorrect; varejao is not currently signed with the cavs; “walley to slow air-ball”, i assume he means wally (and what a pathetic nickname/cut down), who is also not currently signed with the cavs, nor is he expected to be; and then i won’t even comment on the quality of the comment, but the syntax in “Moe — Play — Off, Choke Williams” is just gross (and wrong). so, this cat is 10,000 kinds of wrong.
but i guess he’s got one supporter in you.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 6, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lebron Trade
What team would trade 2-3 allstars and a ton of picks? What team even has multiple all-stars? and if they gave everything to get him, how would they win? I would trade lebron for Anthony-Martin and a 2nd round pick. But even that is asking alot. Not to mention we can’t afford multiple players. I would also do a durant-green, first round pick if they take bobbie also. He is a deal breaker. We are stuck with this hack for 4 more years at 5 mil a year. Any trade the cavs make this year has to include him. We have moe,west, and drafted 2 sg’s – Without gibson, we could of signed one of these good free-agents that we missed out on. I love Odem, or parker – but the chance at a ring vs. a major contract with 2x’s the cash. Thats the world we live in. If LeBron leaves for few extra mil., I give-up on Cleveland sports. No-one wants to play in this city. I don’t know why when a crap-whole like detroit signs players in all sports teams. Why do platers hate Cleveland?
by philip e on Jul 5, 2009 8:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3 way trade for LBJ
Cleveland: ships LBJ and a 1st round pick to the heat and ships Z’s expiring contract to the lakers
Miami: ships Wade to cavs and ships Beasely plus Oneal’s expiring contract to lakers
LA: ships Gasol and Odom to cavs
Cleveland:
Lose- LBJ, Z and a 1st round pick
Gain- Wade, Gasol and Odom
Miami:
Lose- Wade, Beasely and Oneal
Gain- LBJ and a 1st round pick
Lakers:
Lose- Gasol and Odom
Gain- Z, Oneal and Beasely
by Cavs4 life on Jul 5, 2009 8:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What the heck
Cavs should not, and will not trade Lebron James, who is by far the best player in the NBA. Period. End of story.
Thank you for reading.
by Jonas J on Jul 10, 2009 3:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
but then the cavs will be left with nothing when he goes to New York or Miami
If he bolts because the front office did not have the competence to surround him with great players and a decent coaching staff then Cleveland will only be left with Anderson Verajao.
LeBron wants to be a champion. Why would he stay here in cleveland where he has found it impossible to win big, when he could play with Dwyane Wade or Bosh or whichever team has cap space to sign him?
The front office needs to do something significant quick. Shaq is a great addition but does not address all the problems
by UnleashTheMamba on Jul 10, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you have read some of the other threads on the cap space, no team next year will have the ability to sign 2 max free agents.
by talonk on Jul 11, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He doesn’t read or listen to what else anyone else says. He’s like all the rest of the Laker trolls who come here just to let us all know that our team sucks and LeBron is guarenteed to leave after next year. He doesn’t want a real conversation about anything.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 13, 2009 7:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















