I don’t really get this, is he saying that the Cavs are looking to cut payroll?……After they trade for Shaq?

And look at how he words this:

I’ve been advised by one especially knowledgeable observer not to be surprised if

“an especially knowledgeable observer”?

and “don’t be surprised if”….. what a rumor.

West is a trading chip for sure, but the return is going to have to warrant moving him, and I don’t see how this doesn’t then create a new hole (if he is moved for a PF) or simply an even draw (if he’s moved for a G).

is " that massive Cavs payroll" a concern that requires anybody to move? Does Stein or his informant think the Cavs are going to lose big and need to make trades or what?

I’ve heard from Brian Windhorst and other sources that West is virtually untradable to the Cavs. They did not want to give him up in any trade for Shaq last year. I’m sure they would consider it if they were overwhelmed with an offer. but outside of that I don’t see it happening. West is too valuable to the Cavs. After making moves to fortify their roster to win a chempionship, I don’t see why they would trade a big part of their team during the season just to save a few bucks.

Ah yes, the old “don’t be surprised if” routine.

You get to claim credit for making the call if it happens, but totally deny any commitment to the rumor if it’s never fulfilled.