Fear The Sword: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Cavs Line-up (or how i would see it)



pg - mo williams                                         pg - daniel gibson

sg - raja bell                                                 sg - anthony parker

sf - Lebron James                                      sf - jamario moon                       f -  rob kurz

pf - luis scola                                               pf - jj hickson                               pf - leon powe

c  - Shaquille Oneal                                    c - zydrunas ilgauskas              c - stromile swift

 

 

what do you guys think? i did the salary managing and they all fit in to the cap depending on how much cleveland prys powe away from boston for, they do not seem to want him anymore because of his multiple injuries, but the dude is tough as nails and i think would be a valuable asset to the cavs.

I was too lazy to add all the salaries but trust me, they all fit in to the cap:)

This is a Fan-Created Comment on FearTheSword.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff at FearTheSword

0 recs  |  Comment 107 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

West? Varejao? Jackson? Kinsey?

by 7foot3 on Jul 28, 2009 10:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

west verajao jackson & kinsey

all were traded in order to acquire both scola and bell

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you realize that five of those players aren’t even on the Cavs roster? Why even waste our time with this post?

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 3:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah this is terrible.

by hans on Jul 28, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry

for posting a terrible post in your opinion, i will try harder next time

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Besides the fact that Scola has been deemed "untouchable" since Yao is out

I don’t see how it’s so awful.. other than Raja Bell is a starter

by Boney on Jul 29, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes i do realize

this post was “my idea of what the cavs roster should look like”

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would be a championship team

That’s better then the team that’s there right now. I’m assuming you traded West?Varejao? The trades won’t happen,but that is for sure a better team.

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 5:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

West and Varejao for Bell and Scola makes us better? 13.9 WS, 8.9 WARP, 13.8 WP for the former and 11.9 WS, 2.6 WARP, and 12.2 WP for the latter. Not to mention the latter two are older. It’s going to take some pretty convincing work to change my mind.

by 7foot3 on Jul 28, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Way better.

Scola brings more scoring at the Power forward spot. He can do it inside,and outside. Raja Bell can defend much better,and score as good to. People are scared to have Bell defend them.Not West he’s kinda under sized for the shooting guard spot. Varejao is over rated to me. Older yes,but how old is Shaq? If they wan’t to win now go older.

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends how real you think Varejao’s year last year was. His TS% was nearly equal to Scola’s. I can get behind the idea of Scola being an underrated player who might even be better than Varejao. But Bell? Marginal swingmen don’t age well, and he’s going to be 33 this season. He’s not the defender he used to be. And older players are more likely to decline, I don’t see why you really want them.

Of the players added to play alongside Lebron: Szczerbiak was acquired in his age 30 season, Joe Smith – 32, David Wesley – 36, Donyell Marshall – 32, Luscious Harris – 34, Jeff McInnis – 29, Damon Jones – 29, Ben Wallace – 33, Larry Hughes – 27, Flip Murray – 26, Delonte West – 24, Mo Williams – 26

The older players haven’t really worked out. The younger players have been better bets.

by 7foot3 on Jul 28, 2009 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Younger players are almost always better bets. Just because the Cavs added Shaq doesn’t mean that they want to add more older players. I know Boston keeps adding old players (Sheed) but that doesn’t really mean they’re better. The old “proven veteren” cliche is overused.

Also! I’d much rather have West than Bell.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The age cliche is overused period.

All the great players in NBA history decline at around 35 or 36. I got proof to that. The list above you have a bunch of role players.The goal is to win now for the Cavs to keep Lebron. Put the best team out there and win. Ray Allen,and Vince Carter in the East will handle West,or Parker or Moon. You can put Lebron on Vince or Ray,but Paul Pierce,and Lewis will walk all over them even more. Bell is not on a decline. He will lock down a Allen,or a Carter. The Celtics moved on West. West is a good bench player a 6th or 7th man. Scola if you watch the Rockets. Of course had around the same numbers. You had three scores last year. Yao,and Artest,and T-MAC for part of the year. They are stuck with a weak power forward. I wouldn’t be surprised if Z plays more off the bench. Varejo is good for the sometimes flop. Free throws horrible jump shot not there. Down low to small to post up,or pound it down low. He gets put backs. Bostons big baby out plays him.Then Magics Bass will do the same. Lets not forget Garnett. They will have cap space with shaq gone after his last season. Then do the youth thing.

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All the great players in NBA history decline at around 35 or 36. I got proof to that.

Most players decline well before that. I’m not sure how you’re defining “great”, but I’d love to see your proof. Most players start declining around 30 and are done by 36. How many NBA players last year were older than 36? Not many, I know. Very few NBA players are still good in their mid-30’s.

And just because the Cetlics traded West because they thought he wasn’t that good doesn’t mean they were right. West has made himself in to a very good player; he was the Cavs’ second best player in the playoffs. Even I was surprised at how good he’s become. And your boy Bill Simmons loves him and wishes he was still on the Celtics.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan and Malone

Jordan carried a injured Bulls to a 6th championship when he was 35. Karl Malone 35 won his second nba mvp. Karl was 34 and 35 during the two finals in 97,98. Stockton 34 and 35 too. At age 34 Reggie Miller took the Pacers to the finals Averaged 18 points a game. Averaged 18 a game until he was almost 37. Jerry West at 34 turning 35 took the lakers to the finals. With a OLD Wilt. John Havlicek at 35 help lead the Celtics to a championship in 75-76. I could continue? They do decline but not by huge leaps. If they take care of there body’s.Like the best do. They can still do it at a high level. Kobe is getting up there,and he is still the best in the world.

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Shaq won't help you guys either?

He’s going to be 38. Anyone past 36 is garbage right.

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, I never said that. Practice your reading comprehension.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You say done at 36?

Shaq is going to be 38. Is he done? Is he no value to the Cavs?

by green20 on Jul 28, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most players start declining around 30 and are done by 36.

Very few NBA players are still good in their mid-30’s.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you not know the meaning of these words? Or did you just ignore them completely?

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 28, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay

Done by 36.Do you think shaq is done? Not effective?

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, Shaq is not done. He’s not the player he was 5 years ago, of course, but because he was such a dominating player to begin with that he can lose some talent and still be a good player.

Here’s the problem with the list of players above that you used as “proof” of your argument; those players are all all-time great, Hall of Fam worthy players. Those players aren’t like most players; they can still be effective at 35. Not as good as they were at 28 but still pretty good. Those aren’t most players, though, and that’s why I said most players are done by 35.

Now, you said “great” players and I said I didn’t know what you meant by great, so I guess if you meant all-time great, top 1% of players in NBA history great, then you might be right (although many HoF players were done by 35). But we were talking about players like Varejao, West, Bell, Scola, and others, and none of them are anywhere close to the level of the players you cited above, so I don’t know what your point was. You can’t hold all players to the level of Jordan and Stockton and Havlicek and Jerry West. That’s simply ridiculous.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 29, 2009 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will give you a list of role players to.

I was sticking up for the SHAQ’S AND Ray Allens. The all time greats who have question marks. You have Jason Kidd,and Vince Carter still in the NBA. I’m talking about the big 3.

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, coming up with a list of players who are still good at 35 doesn’t change the fact that most players are done by 35. I could give you a list of cities I’ve visited; does that mean I’ve visited most of the cities in the country?

Also, I can pretty much guarentee that every player who is playing at 35 isn’t at the same level he was at 27 or 29 (with a few possible exceptions). So while they still may be good they’re already well in to their decline phase.

If you really think that players begin to decline at 35 then you don’t know much about basketball.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 29, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With a OLD Wilt

but i thought great old players don’t fall off noticably?

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes with a old wilt

two old timers took the lakers to the finals. Proving my point older players still take teams to championships,and win

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the time when players start to decline has a lot less to do with age and a lot more to do with games played, as a general rule. and then, obviously, each player’s own physical make up determines at what stage things start to go south.

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If thats true

Kobe has played 5 less games then a Garnett. Kobe has played more basketball then Garnett he played the past two summers for team USA.

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The list above you have a bunch of role players

So you think bringing in superstar Raja Bell is the answer?

by rufio on Jul 29, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

raja bell

is far from a superstar, i simply put him there because i like his tenacity on defense and his ability to hit open 3’s, he does not take away from the offensive set cleveland runs simply because he plays off of the 1st and 2nd and even 3rd options, he is a spot up guy who can knock it down with consistency, delonte is a guy that creates, which in turn forces him to hold on to the ball way too long for him to be effective.
and yes, i do feel as if acquiring bell would help the team greatly because he can guard ray allen, vince carter and kobe bryant.

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you just have a man crush on Bell. I don’t think anyone else thinks he’s anywhere close to that good.

by rufio on Jul 29, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes stats dont lie

but i believe what makes the cavs better is personnel changes and andy is overpaid and could be used more by a team that would actually need him, cavs need a low post scorer at the pf position so scola would serve cavs needs and verajao would serve houstons lack of a center for the time being and be used as a power forward when yao returns, houston is overloaded at the forward spots, i know scola is a bright spot for their future but andy has just as much up side (without the scoring) as scola does.
and bell feeds off of star players very well, west does not….i already explained that west holds on to the ball way to long to be effective and thows of the balance of the offense almost immediately when he has the ball.

thank you tho:)

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What do solid big men get paid in the NBA? More than what Varejao got. And with Shaq around, the Cavs don’t need a low post scorer at the 4. And you don’t think West played very well alongside Lebron last year? Really? He was an excellent man-on-man defender, allowing Lebron to play the free safety often, he hit open shots around Lebron, and he could handle the ball enough to give this team more options offensively.

by 7foot3 on Jul 29, 2009 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i never said

west never played along side lebron efficiently, all i stated was that i would let go of west because he causes the offense to become off balance and sometimes struggles to get shots off consistently, west also takes very high risk shots.
i like delonte and he does play pretty good defense, but he is too short and lacks length needed to guard bigger 2 guards and wing players, i mean come on, the guy was getting eaten alive by hedo, and hedo in my opinion is not very fast at all.
its not that i dont think west is a great player, i feel as if he would do even better on the bobcats team anyways, he would definitely get the ball much more and in situations that are a bit more comfortable than in cleveland.

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, the first right thing you’ve said is that hedo is not fast. but that’s not his advantage, it’s being big/tall. and west held him to 39% shooting for the series. west did a fine job of guarding hedo, despite the size difference.

also, you keep saying west “causes the offense to become off balance”, but you’ve not provided any support for that. please elaborate…saying a bunch of times doesnt’ make it true.

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, 7-3 is right. you’re really way way off.

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

West was the only one besides LeBron playing with confidence when we lost to Boston in the playoffs. I think he plays very well next to LeBron.

by rufio on Jul 29, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

west

does play well with lebron but we are talking about a team that struggles to score if lebron is not involved somehow, west holds on to the ball far too long to do any significant damage on the offesnive end.
i like west, but i like raja bell at the 2 a whole lot better!

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2009 Prediction: Att - Yds - TD
Jerome Harrison 95 - 532 - 8

by Simmsinns on Jul 28, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks:)

you sir have vision:)

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks!

hey guys thanks for all the input, i appreciate it, i just wanted to see what was everyones opinion whether good or bad, i am open to all comments.
i like raja bell, after the way he defended kobe and the “clothesline incident” i immediately liked the dude as a player, he defends well, even at age 33, he shoots the 3 ball with good consistency, and automatically fits into any system, his only downsides are that he cannot create his own shot like west can, but with a guy like LBJ and Shaq commanding so much attention, guys like raja bell thrive off of that, while guys like west hold on to the ball way too long to be effective.
i traded away andy and jawad along with a draft pick for scola, being that houston needs a center and andy plays both center and power forward, so he can replace scolas position and possibly play center and then houston could start landry?
west could go in a sign and trade with charlotte and i know delonte is guaranteed 4 and another 4 mil after next year but i am sure cleveland would welcome the move in order to save some money, being that bells contract is 5 mil and done after next year.
i like swift because he is cheap and very active, is not afraid to bang down low and was a former teammate of shaq’s back in phoenix, so shaq reuniting with bell and swift would make the transition a bit easier.
cavs are going to sign powe from what i been hearing, and give him some time to work through his injuries and he could contribute a lot! i mean come on, its leon powe! and finally rob kurz, he was fancied by cavs front offices earlier in the free agent off season but they went instead with moon, i believe they could still sign him, he is a stretch forward who can flat out shoot the 3 ball, plus the dude is like 6ft9-6ft10? adds more depth, another shooter and most importantly size!

by NELLY808 on Jul 28, 2009 11:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good post Nelly808

That’s a good line up you put up,and I think a much better team.

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hate to interrupt the mutual admiration society here…but you guys are both crazy if you think that the squad listed above is a much better team than the one the cavs have today. the only place the team is better is PF, and that’s not exactly by a lot. west is a much more productive player than bell today (PER: 14.1 vs. 10.7; TS%: 55.9% vs. 54.8%; ORtg – DRtg: +10 vs. -2; WS: 6.2 vs. 3.5), not to mention west is capable of running the point when mo is out of the game.

leon powe is a MASSIVE injury risk, rob kurz stinks and stro swift is a joke. i’d much rather have our current team than this one.

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly right.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 29, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice point

but i still feel as if this team does better on both ends, bell’s stats do not reflect the type of player he is as of last season because he was playing in a system different from what he was used to in phoenix, i know the type of player he is, and i know his strengths and weaknesses…what i know most of him as that he instantly fits into any role on the squad, but there in charlotte they asked him to do very little and never really used him like he is supposed to be used.
west is very good, but he is inconsistently good, he holds on to the ball way too long to be effective and he takes questionable shots for his level of talent…i understand why you dont agree with this line up and i agree with some of your points, but i still feel as if this team is better than the current squad.
andy could be more effective somewhere else, he fits into any team! he does things that you just cant coach, but that is not what cleveland needs, they need to score at an efficient rate, it seems as if they just cannot keep up with the more elite teams because they lack consistent scorers.
scola would bring scoring from the box and anywhere on the post, shaq will too, but i have a feeling that is not why ferry acquired him, kurz can shoot the ball and he is lengthy, he has talents they could use, cavs never used jj, they never used jawad, and rarely used kinsey and wright so how could you say that their talents are better matched with this team?
kurz’s 3pt shooting would help, so would bells defense and 3pt accuracy, scolas scoring and stretching at that position would definitely give other teams a taste of their own medicine and powe and swift were forgotten talents because of their personal and health issues.

but thanks!

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bell’s stats do not reflect the type of player he is as of last season because he was playing in a system different from what he was used to in phoenix,

Say, possibly one that encourages players to shoot quickly (aka “not holding on to the ball too long”) and potentially inflates their offensive stats?

he instantly fits into any role on the squad

…but he couldn’t fit in on his team last year because he was “never really used him like he is supposed to be used.”?

A healthy Powe and Scola could help us, but Bell and the others aren’t worth what you gave up, period.

by rufio on Jul 29, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I can say i'm glad im not a cavs fan

As a Celtics fan I would be more scared of the team the author posted. I like to read all the blogs,and never comment on team blogs that i’m not a fan of. I think my aging big 3 will win the East,but the Magic could pull it out. The Spurs have a older team,and they will be in the top 2 in the west for sure. This year we could be watching the two oldest teams going for the championship.I’m done with the back and forth. i believe what i say,and you the fans here believe in what you say.Will have to see who’s right in June.

by green20 on Jul 29, 2009 3:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think you’ve mostly argued that a hypothetical Cavs team would be better than the actual Cavs team. We can’t check that in June.

by rufio on Jul 29, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right. And nobody said that teams with older players couldn’t win a championship; I don’t really know what he’s arguing about.

by Buckeye Brad on Jul 29, 2009 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

boston fan

good show chap, we shall see come november! not june

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hope

everyone can agree that i am enttiled to my opinions, and i love the cavaliers, i love shaquille oneal, always been a huge fan of his since LSU, so i am not at all dogging the current roster, all i am simply doing is saying “i wish”

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Jul 29, 2009 10:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

you are of course entitled to your opinions and wishes…i just would like to see more meat behind what you’re saying. clearly, you like raja bell and luis scola, and that’s fine, but i’d be interested to see some numbers that back up why those two would be better than the players the cavs currently have…or, said differently, you have to tell me more, quantitatively, than “scola can score and bell fits in anywhere he goes” to convince me that they’re better players, and/or the team is better with them.

by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 29, 2009 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good lineup

i actually agree with nelly.

i think people are missing the biggest point of the roster change—the value of intangibles. bell doesnt show statwise how valuable he is. but the mere fact that you have a “kobe-stopper” is more valuable than any scoring machine you can add to the team.

last season west struggled to help LBJ provide scoring when it mattered most—duringthe playoffs. it was a one man show, having LBJ get the ball and everyone spread out. when mo wasnt doing his job, west gave some effort but it wasnt enough. this team doesnt need more scorers; the cavs can score any which way they want they have LBJ. what this team needs to do is STOP OTHER TEAMS.

they needed shaq to stop other team centers/pf, mission accomplished. now they need a G-SF-PF stopper that that man is raja bell—someone who can guard kobe and pierce/allen (as well as hedo/vince, ginobili/jefferson, etc…).

the lakers got stronger because they added artest, the ONLY OTHER kobe stopper aside from battier, bell, and bowen—DEADLY considering opponents could have used him.

LBJ could concentrate on guarding SF-PF and help defense (which he is excellent at) and of course, scoring if raja bell was on the team.

this would have made the cavs VERY DEADLY, as they could now guard the 1-2-3 with bell and 2-3-4 with LBJ and of course 4-5 with shaq/varejao.

scola could tremendously help this team with 3pt shooting and length/speed. i would have gotten rid of Z though, and kept varejao—a much better defender. Z is too slow and like i said, his value of offense isnt that needed now that you can pound in low with shaq. Z’s jumpshot while reliable, would create a crowded offense that already 1) has lebron as number one and 2) already has scola shooting and bell shooting (with mo in that mix as well).

this team would make the cavs very adapable to any teams’ offense and versatile.

by inee on Aug 4, 2009 2:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

delonte west is a much better player than raja bell by every statistical measure…including defense. the only time bell ever stopped kobe was with that elbow to the throat a couple of years ago. the cavs would be a significantly worse team w/ bell at the 2 over west.

what’s more, anthony parker and jamario moon are much more valuable length/stretch defenders (and shooters, for that matter) than raja bell…and the cavs have both of them.

also, scola is not a 3pt shooter.

otherwise, great work.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 4, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Put that hot sauce in my bag.

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 3:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bell is highly regarded by everyone—in the league and in the media—as one of the top defenders today.

http://www.82games.com/pelton20.htm

“It’s easy to see why playing against Bell is so frustrating for high scorers.”

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2006/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&id=2435643

“In Game 1, Philly’s only victory, Bell helped limited Bryant to 15 points on 7-for-22 shooting.”

http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/article/2008-05-22/dirty-jobs-game-prep-nba-stopper-raja-bell

“Kobe averaged 24.2 points — 11.2 under his season average — in th e series when Bell played. In the game Bell was forced to sit, Bryant scored 50 "

bell’s defense on mamba is well-documented. please provide evidence of west’s so-called superior statistical defense. please also provide proof of moon and parker.

not only is raja bell one of the top defenders today, but he blisters from 3-point range—comparably to ray allen. this would be a very good pickup for the cavs’ in-out game.

i made an error on scola’s 3-pt shooting though, i must have thought ginobili.

by inee on Aug 4, 2009 7:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

gladly. first, you’re showing 2 articles from 2006 and another from 2008. we’re approaching the 2009-2010 season…this argument is about who is better TODAY, not who was better at guarding kobe in a playoff series 2, 3, 4 years ago.

as well, you’ll notice on basketball-reference.com that in 2008-2009, raja bell’s defensive rating was 111, which means that his estimated points allowed per 100 possessions was 111. in 2008-2009, delonte west’s defensive rating was 104, a full 7 points lower than bell’s per 100 possessions. what’s more, over the last three seasons, bell has put up DRtg of 110, 111, 111; west has posted 108, 108, and 104. not a fluke 2008-09 result. furthermore, when comparing bell’s offensive rating (an estimate of points scored per 100 possessions) to his defensive rating, in 2008-09, bell was a net negative for his teams — ORtg of 109, DRtg of 111, costing his team 2 points per 100 possessions. west, by contrast, was a net positive for the cavs, logging a 114 ORtg, and contributing 10 points per 100 possessions to the cavaliers. i also mention in another post above that west can handle the PG duties when called upon…a skill that raja bell does not possess.

bell’s WARP was negative last year, west was a +3.4. bell shoots a better clip from 3 (42.1% vs. 39.9% for west in 08-09), but west’s true shooting , which takes into account 2’s, 3’s and FT’s was a superior 55.9 vs. 54.8% for bell. lastly, on the bell/west front, bell turns 33 this season, delonte 26. i feel comfortable that we’ve put this one to bed.

moon’s DRtg was 107 last year (ORtg was 116), he contributed 3.2 WARP (versus a negative WARP for bell), and his TS% was an even more impressive 56.7% vs. 54.8% for bell (though bell had the pure 3 point edge here). parker was less statistically impressive than west or moon, but was still better overall than bell: contributing 0.7 WARP (versus negative WARP for bell). looking at the numbers, i overstated his value, relative to bell, as far as shooting and defense: parker’s DRtg was the same as bell, 111, while his ORtg was a less valuable 105; his TS% was lower than bell’s, as was his pure 3-point shooting.

most importantly, bell was not available through free agency, which really makes this argument purely academic. however, i think it is abundantly clear that both west and moon are substantially superior contributors at this stage of their careers, and two guys the cavs would much rather have than raja bell, both offensively and defensively. anthony parker, on the other hand, is perhaps much closer to bell as a value proposition, but parker had a better WARP (and ultimately, isn’t wins what this game is all about?) and was available, unlike bell. i can’t imagine a legitimate piece (a contributor) from this cavs team that i would move out for bell.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 4, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

while these numbers show current values for the current players, it stands to reason that you’re pulling OPTIMUM numbers from current players versus non-optimum numbers for bell.

it IS all academic, because we cannot use arguments like “what-if” now; but suffice it to say that it would be better to compare bell’s statistics during HIS peak with the current players you’re citing now (their peak or peaking). it stands to reason that bell during the last two years have watered out his statistics whether due to new roles/team/adjusting when the suns lost d’antoni and when he moved to charlotte—it simply isnt the same bell as before. i do not count aging toward this, only the fact that he has been adjusting to the new “defensive philosophy” when shaq came to phoenix and AGAIN when he was under larry brown; and so he hasnt been thriving as he used to.

even at that, excuses aside, he still put up decent numbers currently, and as you have stated, in the last three years he still led west by some 7 points defensive rating.

however you make a valid point in that age is a huge factor; but there are two ways to go about this and other journalists echo this—you either hire experienced guns to win now, or you hire new guns for the longshot. with LBJ, they need to win NOW, because there may not be a next year.

also take into account (and you have stated this) that west never defended every SG by himself—even though he takes a lot of credit for this. even hedo wasnt guarded one-on-one by west. the cavs employ probably the stringest team-defense in the league and so we cannot fully attribute west’s numbers unto himself. the same cannot be said for bell—nash couldnt defend much, neither can diaw. marion is undersized and so is amare for the likes of d12 and shaq. further, the suns THEN werent really known for their defense and so bell really needed to take it upon himself to stop players.

the same scenario does not exist for west, who has andy as an excellent help defender (and trapper) and LBJ who patrols and mows down anyone trying to get a shot. i cannot fully give credit to west for his current numbers, but you can pull up his numbers from past teams so we can compare.

by inee on Aug 5, 2009 2:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it stands to reason that you’re pulling OPTIMUM numbers from current players versus non-optimum numbers for bell.

that doesn’t stand to reason at all, actually. but, you feel free to pull some optimum numbers for bell, and let me know why he’s better than west. i’m confident that those numbers don’t exist.

it would be better to compare bell’s statistics during HIS peak with the current players you’re citing now

that is ridiculous. bell’s prime is many years past…whomever employs bell now will not get “peak” bell, they’ll get 111 defensive rating bell. it is most informative to compare bell’s current numbers with west, moon, parker’s numbers.

in the last three years he still led west by some 7 points defensive rating.

you’ve misunderstood defensive rating. bell was worse than west in defensive rating in each of the last 3 years. higher is worse in defensive rating (i.e. 111 is worse than 104).

and your assessment of west’s defense/cavs’ team defense versus bell/suns is absurd.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 5, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

west is undersized against bigger players, current analysts echo this remark. delonte’s success defensivey mostly comes from limiting shooting guards—but even that is debatable because shooting guards have off-nights as well. if west can CONSISTENTLY hold the same person below their average then he is a good case. but even at that, his size is a liability. someone like ariza or bowen with either strength or length and speed would prove more valuable.

by inee on Aug 4, 2009 8:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

well, now we’re being ridiculous. bowen’s numbers are much worse than west’s (DRtg, ORtg, TS%, WARP), for one thing; for another, ariza isn’t clearly better (similar DRtg, ORtg, inferior TS%, 1.6 more WARP than west); and finally, how many names do you want to throw at the board? dwyane wade and brandon roy would be better at the 2 than west…you left them out.

west held hedo, a much bigger player, to 39% shooting in the playoffs, below his season average of 41.3% shooting. as well, from a points allowed and FG% allowed perspective, the cavs were top-2 in the nba at the shooting guard slot (according to 82games). that’s not just b/c of “off nights”. of course, west didn’t log all of the SG minutes, nor did he guard every SG for every second, but it stands to reason that he was a big part of that performance as our starting 2.

i’m not saying that west isn’t undersized, or that that doesn’t represent a problem for him and the cavs…what i am saying is that it’s an easy crutch to lean on to say “west is too small”, and not look deeper into the numbers to see that, despite his size, he defends very, very well. west’s size is not a particularly large issue for the cavs…the numbers show that.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 4, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we cant pull wade and roy because they are impossible to get. we’re also talking defense.

again, west holding hedo—i cannot fully give him credit for that. even TNT analysts have echoed that west is undersized and he cannot stop hedo. hedo dropping 2% is nothing to speak about (versus 11ppg under ave for bell guarding kobe); again, the cavs’ help defense plays a big role in this—and even at that, they couldnt stop the pick-and-roll of orlando.

i will give him credit though, with what you said that he WAS a big part of that performance. but you also overstated this: “delonte west is a much better player than raja bell by every statistical measure…including defense”.

by inee on Aug 5, 2009 2:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

but you also overstated this: "delonte west is a much better player than raja bell by every statistical measure…including defense".

i’m ready for you to prove me wrong. i just don’t see you doing so. by what statistical measure is raja bell, today, a superior basketball player to delonte west?

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 5, 2009 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you happy now brad? i guess some people pop an aneurysm at the most insignificant things.

anyways.

joey, you said west is “MUCH better”, “by EVERY statistical measure”.

2008-2009:
bell: 13ppg, 1.51to, 0.8spg, 2.5apg, 4rpg, 88ft%, 39%3pt, 44%fg, 11.7PER, 107ORTg, 109Drtg
west: 12ppg, 1.44to, 1.5spg, 3.5apg, 3.2rpg, 83ft%, 40%3pt, 46%fg, 12.6PER, 114ORTg, 104Drtg

1. EVERY – wrong.
2. MUCH – wrong.

overstated.

in the 3 seasons that were bell’s peak (with the d’antoni system) his PER was 12.7, 12.2, 12.9; in 2003 his DRtg was actually 105—very comparable to west’s peak moments.

then of course, you have the fact that charlotte beat los angeles twice during that season but LA beat the cavs twice. might be hard to prove bell’s value here since west wasnt with the cavs when LA beat them, but its a point worth noting.

again i attribute bell’s dip in stats to his new environment (twice changed—during shaq, and post-shaq)

by inee on Aug 6, 2009 4:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don’t know why people always go to a “you popped an aneurysm” place in the course of a disagreement/discussion when the other side takes the time to use numbers to prove his point. i haven’t popped anything…i’m actually enjoying the process of positing an argument and finding supporting evidence. you just haven’t found any supporting evidence of your claim that bell would improve the cavs.

i do find it interesting, though, that you found 3 statistical categories, out of all those that you listed, in which bell surpassed west (points, rebounds, FTs).

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 6, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, I think he’s saying that I “popped an aneurysm” because I asked if he knew how to use the reply button. I didn’t know asking a simple question constituted getting really upset. I wonder what he would have said if I had actually gotten mad or something.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 6, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you really not know how to use the reply button?

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 5, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hedo dropping 2% is nothing to speak about (versus 11ppg under ave for bell guarding kobe)

once more, you’ve focused on the wrong numbers. kobe’s ppg may have declined, but that’s beside the point. there are any number of reasons points could go down…fewer shots, fewer minutes, blowouts keeping him on the bench, injuries.

what’s actually important is that in the 6 games in which raja bell played in the 05-06 lakers/suns series, kobe’s FG% was 47.2%, as compared to his regular season FG% in 05-06 of 45.0%. kobe’s TS% for the series was 58.7% versus 55.9% for the regular season. so, actually, kobe was better offensively in the playoffs (against raja) than he was in the regular season.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 5, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry but that’s pushing it. i think we need to put this to rest, because you’re pulling insignificant stuff to prove your point.

1. i never said bell was better than west. you’re twisting this whole argument to meet your needs. the whole point was the team that the original poster made—with the roster changes as a whole would benefit the cavs. the point we’re drilling down to, is that the cavs DONT need someone like west who can do a lot of good things including offense—they need someone who can be a role player like bell who can play solid one-on-one defense and stop someone like bryant. AS A WHOLE, including the changes above, bell is more valuable that west to the team especially if they’re playing teams with one elite player (bryant, pierce, wade, iverson, t-mac, etc…) that needs to be stopped.

2. “shots, fewer minutes, blowouts keeping him on the bench, injuries” that doesnt apply here; or in the argument we raised as none of them happened during that time. fact of the matter is, and every statistician has made this evident across the media on the web—BELL DEFENDS BRYANT successfully a lot of times.

3. bryant’s averages almost ALWAYS increase during playoffs so your last argument is moot.

2008: 25-2.7-4.6-4.5-77-35%-50% season; 30-1.6-5.5-5.3-88-35%-46%
2007: 28-1.8-5.4-6.3-84-36%-46% season; 30-1.7-5.6-5.7-81-30%-48%

i really dont think we have to debate this much longer, it is accepted fact throughout basketball world that bell is some sort of kobe-stopper although kobe does like to play at a higher level since he wants to disprove this—and sometimes he succeeds.

dude—the point was never “who is the better player”, but who could the cavs use to their advantage to succeed this year. im sure west is a better player and younger. but the cavs need role players to help LBJ.

by inee on Aug 6, 2009 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think we need to put this to rest, because you’re pulling insignificant stuff to prove your point.

if by “insignificant stuff”, you mean convincing statistics, then i’m right there with you. i’m fine putting this to bed, though, b/c if you’re not interested in seeing the numbers for what they say, then we’ll just keep going around and around.

is that the cavs DONT need someone like west who can do a lot of good things including offense

dude…think about what you just said there. the cavs, essentially, don’t need a good player. in fact, you’re saying that it would benefit the cavs to have a clearly WORSE player on the roster, in the form of bell. if that’s not the most ridiculous thing i hear all day, i’ll be surprised.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 6, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where were the “you don’t make moves in reaction to one player/one team” police on this one?

We have to get to the NBA finals to get the chance to stop Kobe.

Also, when the chips are down, isn’t LeBron going to guard Kobe even if Bell is on the team?

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 3:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lebron is tons better at defense than bell. but for some reason, in the limited times i’ve seen him guard kobe (he doesnt usually), he cant guard him. watch youtube videos of kobe throwing high-arc shots over him to avoid blocked shots. also, the last minute of the usa team blue team-red team exhibition shows this as well—kobe guarded lebron’s last shot and lebron tanked while lebron guarded kobe’s last shot and kobe made it.

by inee on Aug 7, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

again, missed the point entirely. we should just move on.

but keep this in mind, the lakers team that had 4 superstars in kobe, shaq, malone, and payton were beat clueless by a pistons team that had no superstar but a bunch of role players and maybe a couple of good stars. the suns with its triangle of amare, nash, and shaq didnt win. the spurs employ a one-superstar-everyone else-role-player attitude as well. the heat championship of wade-shaq-and role players as well.

i think boston was the first in a long while that has won with 3 superstars or more; but mind you, they won because of their role players.

by inee on Aug 7, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe it’s not that i’m missing the point…perhaps you aren’t actually making any good points?

how about the lakers team that just won w/ kobe, gasol and odom? those aren’t 2 superstars and one major star? and how about the team they beat in the finals? howard, lewis, turkoglu don’t qualify as pretty major stars? also, if you think duncan, ginobili and parker aren’t major stars, you are fooling yourself.

im sure west is a better player and younger.

that’s all i need. if you want to cling to “bell has better intangibles for the cavs”, that’s fine.

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 7, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. “maybe it’s not that i’m missing the point…perhaps you aren’t actually making any good points?” ok, sure. nevermind.

2. the lakers are like the spurs—one superstar and a couple of elite players. until gasol gets even better at defense (he made good strides last season) im not calling him a major star. gasol and odom are nowhere near the status of stoudamire or garnett. as for orlando, turkoglu and lewis are a couple of good players too; but the system they’re in inflates their stats. they werent that good when they were the stars of their respective teams. duncan is a superstar; but ginobili and parker are again a couple of elite players only—put them on a different team and they likely wouldnt flourish as much.

its a whole different level when you had allen as the superstar of the sonics, pierce as the superstar of the celtics, and garnett as the superstar of the wolves all come together with a bunch of very good role players that did all the intangibles AND things that reflected on the scoreboard.

3. "bell has better intangibles for the cavs" - that was the whole point to begin with, we shouldnt even have started this if you saw this in my first post. the cavs need bell for this because whatever west had over bell (and its not that much) can be provided for by scola and shaq-defense and offense; and then LBJ and mo can help on ball handling.

by inee on Aug 8, 2009 3:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

what happened? did i accidentally click on the strikeout?

by inee on Aug 8, 2009 4:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This whole idea that there’s one way to build a team, and we can neatly fit players into groups is ridiculous. Not to mention when every individual wants to be able to define who goes into what group. You want to put the most talent on the floor that you can, period.

by 7foot3 on Aug 8, 2009 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the cavs DONT need someone like west who can do a lot of good things including offense

This is a joke, right? The Cavaliers have been a great defensive team for the past few years. And I’m not sure how much Kobe Bryant is really beating them.

The difference between the Cavs last year and previous years is solid perimeter players. Guys who could do a lot of good things on offense, like make those open jumpers Lebron gets them, or create their own shot when need be.

by 7foot3 on Aug 7, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no one said the cavs havent been a great defensive team. they ARE probably the best defensive team; the problem is, their defense works on 99% of the NBA. that last 1% is orlando and los angeles.

if you’re not sure how bryant is beating them, how about MAKE SURE that he isnt beating them by adding someone who can hold bryant down for sure? it doesnt have to be bell, it could have been artest (which they tried to get) or battier, or prince or ariza (which they tried to get).

west can create his own shots, he picked up the offensive slack when mo wasnt performing. if you’re referring to gooden, id rather have west. i dont know what happened to gibson, he was very good in the piston series, he somehow declined.

by inee on Aug 8, 2009 4:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orlando and Los Angeles play well against almost everyone’s defense. If you think you’re going to devise a scheme that stops the most talented offensive teams, you are mistaken. It’s not that were not sure how Bryant is beating the Cavs. It’s how much. Bryant is a great player, who is going to get plenty of shots. No one, not even your dream-world Raja Bell (who isn’t the player you think he is anymore) is going to hold him down. We didn’t get to see West, the Cavs best one-on-one perimeter defender, on him this year and they still played Bryant pretty well.

Who mentioned Gooden? Or Gibson? Where did that come from?

You and Nelly have made your opinions known. Others have disagreed, and they’ve used some facts to defend their opinions, deal with it. Don’t play the victim. The website shouldn’t be for people to come here and make endless posts about the same thing, and those who don’t conform to the rules. Take a step back and look around. This isn’t about quieting voices of the fans. This is about keeping this place from becoming a madhouse.

by 7foot3 on Aug 8, 2009 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Adding someone who can play defense against Kobe or a bigger 2 isn’t the issue. The issue is adding that person at the expense of West. If we could just ink Ariza and cut someone at the bottom of the roster I think it’d be a no-brainer.

by rufio on Aug 8, 2009 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TNT analysts have also help pushup contests against female crew members on live TV.

Learn to use the reply button.

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 3:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

help held

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 3:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t ask him to use the reply button — I tried that and he got very upset. I guess asking him to follow a simple procedue to make these posts easier to read is unacceptable to him.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 7, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. i dont know which soap opera drama you’re watching, but nothing in my posts reeks “i got very upset”.

2. you didnt “ask me to follow a simple procedure”. you insulted me by making a sarcastic comment that was meant to question my intelligence. HARDLY the responsible and welcoming attitude that is common in communities. simply uncalled for.

3. nothing again, reeks of this being “unacceptable to me” as I HAVE done it.

for being a statistic teacher—what or who exactly do you teach? you’re supposed to be more mature than this. but you still apparently burn me for this repeatedly, despite my attempts to leave it alone.

is this the attitude that is prevalent in this site? gang-banging? or is that what a lot of the people here are finding out? that the people here like to gang-rape others who differ from them? look at how you guys pile up on nelly who is trying to contribute to this site.

this is not the kind of cavs fansite that encourages new people unless they want to bend over for you all.

by inee on Aug 8, 2009 3:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you happy now brad? i guess some people pop an aneurysm at the most insignificant things.

That was you getting upset.

It’s impossible to follow a conversation if someone continually posts his replies on the bottom of the page instead of using the reply button. It’s really not that hard to do and it makes the blog much easier to follow, so I don’t see what is wrong with me trying to get you to use the reply button. If you’ve apparently been here before, as you say you have, then you should know how to reply so I don’t know why you weren’t doing it then.

And I wasn’t being mean to you so don’t get so defensive. If you can’t take someone asking you to use the reply button then you’re not going to last long on here or any other blog.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 8, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, it’s simple: if you want to reply to what someone said, you click on the word reply. Even people with questionable intelligence can do it. When you don’t, no one knows what you are talking about.

Asking you to do that or disagreeing with someone else based on facts and logic is hardly comparable to “gang rape”.

by rufio on Aug 8, 2009 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

People seem to like coming here, acting like idiots, and then playing the victim when someone calls them on it.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 8, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI Nelly,

If you are supposing what the roster could like, the details of the trading you did (draft picks, players) to achieve that roster would have been very helpful in the initial post.

by talonk on Aug 6, 2009 3:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

aite, yea i see where you are coming from

good looking out, ill remember next time

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 7, 2009 6:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh and for the record

you can fall in love with delonte west all you want guys, the facts are simple.
no stat is bigger than the “win-loss” stat, remember that, and raja bell is simply a winner.
west has better numbers because he takes much more shots, and can create for himself, but he is undersized at that position and can throw off the balance of the offense when he “decides” to be involved.
all i am saying is that even though west is a better player, all they need from that 2 spot is a larger defender that can hit wide open shots! i just happen to like bell’s defensive tenacity and throw in the thought of cleveland possibly facing the lakers in the finals and you have yet another reason why i pick bell over delonte , simply to guard kobe.
i am not at all saying that bell’s numbers are superior to west, i am simply stating that bell encompasses what the cavs need at that spot…that is all!

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 7, 2009 6:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

no stat is bigger than the "win-loss" stat, remember that, and raja bell is simply a winner.

this is such a joke. wins and losses, especially in basketball, are about so much more than one player — not to mention a role player (which is what bell is and always has been). what a horrible “stat” to quote…and what, exactly, has bell won?

by DontCallMeJoey on Aug 7, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah this is one of the dumbest things every written on this site (and that’s really saying something). It’s bad enough when people judge a star player by his team’s wins and losses, but a role player? Is he serious? How is Bell “simply a winner.” What titles has he won, anyways?

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 7, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

dumbest things?

well buckeyebrad let me apologize for burning your eyes as well as grinding your gears with my post, i mean you did not have to read it, but i am sure you are a very intelligent human being brad and you already knew that.
bell has won tons of games with phoenix, i am not saying he won any championships so don’t go calling everyone to burn me at the stakes just yet dude…oh and judge a star player by his teams wins or losses? what was that about man? did i say anything regarding that? or have the witc hunting already begun? hahahaha….geez, i am a cleveland cavaliers fan, just like y’all, all i did was post a line up that i seemed fit that’s all.

taking this a bit too serious are we?

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 7, 2009 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you say something dumb on this site then you should expect to have it called out. Don’t get all defensive.

You can’t judge any player by his team’s wins and losses. That’s simply ridiculous. If you’re going to say “Raja Bell is simply a winner” when he hasn’t had more success than anyone on the Cavs, including West, then that’s simply wrong and you should be prepared to have it called out. This site isn’t a place where you can just say anything you want and get away with it.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 7, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Delonte clearly isn’t a winner. I mean, it isn’t like he just won a bunch of regular season games last year.

Here’s what you mean: “I, Nelly808, simply prefer Bell to West. There is no reason behind it or no real logical point to be made, it is simply a preference I have. Every piece of evidence, every argument goes to West, but I just like Raja Bell.”

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well ...

you sir are entitled to your opinion, and i thank you for replying to what i have posted, but in comparison to west, bell is much more of a better fit, i mean have you even read my statements thoroughly? basketball is a game my man, and the object of the game is to win….end of story!
there is no greater stat than the win loss column dude and i have no idea why you feel differently? bell is a role player, and that is what they need, players who know their respective roles! west is a better player than bell, i already admitted that, that is as plain as the eye can see!!!!! i never said west was better or is better! so just end that already.
all i simply stated was that bell would be a better fit with the skills that he has that is all, and what has bell won? are you kidding me? have you watched any phoenix suns games from 2004 until the end of dantoni’s reign? they were unbelievable, i know they never won a championship, but neither has west…bell helped those suns teams to be very successful and as good as he was, he still played into the system and not try to do his own thing.
west however crumbles the cavs halfcourt system when james is not in the game, and the cavs get worse with delonte at the point, he takes too long to be effective and holds on to the ball far too long and he is undersized, the dude got tons of heart, but so does bell, let me ask you guys a question?….who would you rather have guarding vince carter or hedo or kobe? delonte west or raja bell?

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 7, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there is no greater stat than the win loss column dude and i have no idea why you feel differently?

Wins are losses are used to judge teams NOT players. That’s his problem with your statement.

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 7, 2009 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i mean have you even read my statements thoroughly?

Its not that no one reads your statments thuroughly, its that your statements are poorly supported, illogical, and at times laughably wrong. You have offered zero support that Bell is a “better fit” beyond saying that you think Delonte holds on to the ball too much. I do not remember a single instance where I thought Delonte was holding the ball too long, so unless you are going to prove it, no one believes you.

What exactly is Bell’s “role” that you see needs to be played on the Cavs? Kobe-stopping? For better or worse, LBJ will guard Kobe when the chips are down over West or Bell. Role played by LeBron. West plays roles that Bell can’t—who is going to fill those?

Aside from the fact that good players can play on bad teams (Wade on the Heat a year ago) or bad players can play on great teams (plenty of these)—which means that W-L record is not a good way to judge individual players, especially role players—you don’t even want to acquire someone who has actually won.

The Cavs have had zero problems winning in the regular season since early in LeBron’s career. We don’t need Raja Bell for that. We got the 1 seed last year, and everyone knew it was going to be the same 3 teams at the top anyway. If you are going to argue for someone who isn’t as good of a player as West, at least argue for someone with a ring. Bell would have needed to have won a ring by now to even be an upgrade in the “winner” column SO HE ISN’T. Bell didn’t help those Suns win, Marion, Stoudamire, and especially Nash helped those Suns win.

Delonte had 66 regular season wins last year, how many did Bell have? How many times last year
did Raja’s team lose to Delonte’s (3 out of 3)?

by rufio on Aug 7, 2009 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

illogical, poorly supported? and laughably wrong….wow, are you trying to to say that a “fantasy” team in which i “wish” had happened instead of the current roster, has to be logical? it has to please everyone especially you? are you saying that this scenario in which i concocted does not make “any” sense to you?
bells role is to better defend vince carter, ray allen, hedo turkoglu, dwayne wade and joe johnson on the regular since the players i just mentioned are all eastern 2 guards and the best of the crop too i might add.
and yes, it would be nice to know that if we were to meet the lakers in the finals, that bell is capable of slowing down kobe bryant, and why in the world do you guys keep insisting that i am saying all these things like i think bell did all the work doing phoenix’s awesome run during the dantoni campaign? i never said that, all i said was that he is accustomed to winning, he has been in that environment where playing at that high level was part of being a sun, he thrived in that culture.
bell was a crucial part of the suns offense and defense, and the dude can hit open 3’s no doubt! he plays with a great attitude and instantly fits into any system efficiently….he never does too much and never plays outside of his role…..the guy shoots 80 from the line, 90 last season and 41 from the arch…his turn overs are a mere 1 a game and he locks his man down on defense…why in the world would you “not” want him on your team?..hes 6ft5 to delonte’s 6ft2

well like i said before, even though bell averages more ppg than delonte, i believe delonte is the better player, but i still feel bell would be a better fit…thanks for your insight and i appreciate it also…end

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 8, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow, are you trying to to say that a "fantasy" team in which i "wish" had happened instead of the current roster, has to be logical?

Yes, if you want me to agree with you that Bell would be a better fit on the Cavs. That’s the problem, you “wish” that Bell was on the team and it wouldn’t make the Cavs better.

bells role is to better defend vince carter, ray allen, hedo turkoglu, dwayne wade and joe johnson

West does pretty well against all of those guys. Yes, they are very good, but Bell won’t slow them down more than West will. Do you have any statistics to back this up or do you just think this is the case? Did Wade and Carter actually score less points or shoot a lower% against Bell last year than they did against West? Without something like that, I just don’t believe you because there is nothing to support what you are saying. Being 2-3 inches taller does not make Bell the better defender. Because analysts have called him a “Kobe-stopper” does not make him a better defender.

all i said was that he is accustomed to winning, he has been in that environment where playing at that high level was part of being a sun

The problem with this is that if you change “Sun” to “Cav”, you can say the exact same thing about West! There is no reason to take Bell over West because they are equal in that category.

bell was a crucial part of the suns offense and defense

So you think he did do a lot of the work, then? Was he really more “crucial” than Stoudamire, Nash, or Marion? I don’t think he was, and as the 4th most “crucial” player at best, I’ll stick by it that he was not “crucial” to the Suns.

the dude can hit open 3’s no doubt!

And Delonte can, too—again, no reason for Bell over West.

he never does too much and never plays outside of his role

…and no one here besides you thinks that West does, either. Again, if West “held on to the ball too long”, you could probably point to a play we all remember or tell us exactly when he did this or why it was holding on to the ball too long, but you haven’t, so no one agrees with you.

why in the world would you "not" want him on your team?

Its not that I wouldn’t want him on the team at all, its that I wouldn’t dump West for him because as even you admit West is the better player.

but i still feel bell would be a better fit

Yes, but we are contending that this is a completely irrational feeling on your part. There is no reason to feel that way, which is why I and others disagree with you.

by rufio on Aug 8, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no stat is bigger than the "win-loss" stat, remember that, and raja bell is simply a winner.

Raja Bell’s teams have won as few as 26 and as many as 61 games. The reason for the differences? The other 11 guys on the roster. You absolutely cannot judge one guy on his team’s W-L record. Not even Lebron James. There’s a lot of other factors. You say it yourself, West is a better player. Why do we need to go any further? You still don’t prove how he throws off the balance of the offense. The need better players, period. Fitting the right player into the right scheme works, but it can’t take a backseat to pure talent. And they have a larger defender that can hit shots already. Parker. And there isn’t any proof out there that Bell can guard Kobe better than West. And there’s no proof that this is something the Cavs need to focus on. In fact, most of the evidence points against those two things.

We get it, you are just voicing your opinion, but you have to be prepared to accept that some people will disagree and can defend their opinion better, even if we’re all Cavs fans.

by 7foot3 on Aug 7, 2009 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hhmmm...

i never said raja bell was the only reason for the suns success, all i said was he knows what it takes to win and win at a high level, he also is very well known for his lock down defense , especially against the games current best player (kobe bryant)…raja bell in my opinion would guard most of the top 2 guards better than delonte and has more length and height.
bell may struggle to get points at times because he is not one of those dudes that can create his own shot effectively, but i believe that if used correctly, he could be major for them as a spot up shooter on the wings…that is what cleveland needs, i know they got parker now, but i was just dreaming up a scenario in which he had bell than parker ya know?

i never said bell was better than west, all i said was bell is a better fit and his game would better serve clevelands needs at the 2.

"minds sharpens minds, like steel sharpens steel"

by NELLY808 on Aug 8, 2009 8:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

We’ve heard this multiple times, almost verbatim. Would you like it if everyone repeated their exact arguments again as well? Unless you’re going to respond to the arguments that West is the superior defender in the present, and anecdotal evidence from a few years ago doesn’t mean much, or that West’s offense has been such a significant boost to the Cavs, who have tried players with similar (poor) offensive abilities to Bell’s, that we do need someone who can create in the backcourt, then we’ve thoroughly beaten this discussion into the ground.

by 7foot3 on Aug 8, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he wants to keep having this same discussion over and over again with the hopes that somebody will finally agree with him. After all, his argument is that Bell “knows what it takes to win and win at a high level” — how could anyone possibly argue with that kind of logic? I mean, look at all the college and NBA championships that he has won (answer = 0).

by Buckeye Brad on Aug 8, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

I have seen this post has gotten a lot more responses since I stopped watching this post. The author clearly knows what he is talking about. Raja Bell in 2007 made the most three pointers in the league. He can make the three as good as West. You know what poor West. West should stay on the team.He would be a good back up to Bell.Moon and Parker are not even close to Bell. PARKER is older then Bell. Bell is a better defender then West for sure. In a team defense like Cleveland prides them self on.Bell will be perfect. For Scola he brings everything that Varejo brings,but better so much better. I like how must of you stick by your team. I’m a Indians fan,and Browns fan. The Indians break my heart every year.Especially in 1997.

by green20 on Aug 9, 2009 12:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FearTheSword(FTS) is the ultimate independent resource for the Cleveland Cavaliers on the web. We look to provide hardcore Cavaliers fans positive, independent insight about the Cavs, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Cavaliers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why not Iverson in Cleveland?
Small
Would you trade Varejao for Al Jefferson?
Kryptonite02_small
(Very) Early Observations
Maxme_small
Big Z & Delonte for Capn Jack & Turiaf?
Small
no more mike brown, PLEASE!
840-beer-holder_small
Shaq's last chance?
The_lantern_small_small
THE BEST HE EVER HAD?????
Being-manny_small
Stats Expert on the ORL Series, West
Small
Why Delonte
Picture_010_small
Most amazing dunk I have seen in some time!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Socialize With FearTheSword

Facebook_badge_medium_medium_medium
Black_generated_button
Fts_email_medium




Owner/General Manager/Head Coach

Fts_small_small John Bena (aka CavsBlogger)

Asst. Coach

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad

Jay_mariotti_resigns_2_cropped_small Turkmenbashi