ESPN reports Pistons to hire Cavs assistant John Kuester as head coach
The Detroit Pistons, who couldn't work out a contract with Avery Johnson to be their next head coach, appear to be turning to Cavs assistant coach John Kuester as their man. Kuester was as assistant coach for the Pistons in 2004 when they won the NBA championship and has been with the Cavs for the past two years. He served as "offensive coordinator" last year and was credited with the improvements in the Cavs' offense this past season. The Cavs don't want to lose Kuester, especially to a division rival, but won't stand in the way of his first head coaching opportunity.
over 2 years ago
Buckeye Brad
25 comments
0 recs |
Comments
So what
Coaches don’t make championship teams, player do. Worthless to spend our time worrying about this mirror loss. This is like losing 5 cents when you make a million a year.
Baseball is God's sport! All Truth Goes Through Three Stages 1.It is ridiculed 2.It is violently opposed 3.Finally, it is accepted as self-evident. kinesiologist
this is really, ridiculously wrong.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 7, 2009 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
When our coach is Mike Brown
who hasn’t been a very good offensive minded coach, we need all the great minds we can get.
This loss hurts.
by Hardcore Legend on Jul 7, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Brown may not be a very good offensive coach, but we have to wait and see on this. For the first time in the Lebron era this year, the Cavs had a starting guard with a +.500 TS%, and actually they had two. The offense is going to look a hell of a lot better when they guys you ask to make jump shots can actually do that, regardless of who is drawing up the plays.
And even without Kuester, the Cavs are going to run the same basic sets, and opponents are going to know what they want to do.
your point about the TS% is well-taken, but doesn’t adding shaq to the mix change our sets some and make it important that an effective offensive coach is at the controls?
i think “knowing what they want to do” has been a hallmark of all of the cavs’ offenses since 23 got to town. it’s not like kuester caught anyone off guard last year.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 7, 2009 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok take Phil Jackson away from the Lakers
Do they still win as many Championships? I doubt it, Kobe without Jackson has won 0 rings, Michael Jordan without Jackson has won 0 rings as well. Coaching is important too.
We didn't lose the games, we just ran out of time -- Bobby Layne
And Phil Jackson without a MVP-type player (who had plenty of help) has won how many rings? Larry Brown didn’t go from a genius in Detroit to an idiot in NY overnight.
OK, obviously it takes great players to win in the NBA. Nobody is going to argue that. But that doesn’t mean coaching isn’t important. Great coaches can put a team over the edge when playing a team of equal talent.
In the NBA, it’s definitely more important to have great players than a great coach, but coaches still are an important part of a team’s success.
No doubt coaching is important, but who was the mastermind behind putting Lebron on the nail and letting him go to work? As much as we want to bash Mike Brown, we really don’t know how much of the offense is Brown and how much is Kuester. It sucks that he is leaving, but it’s really not that big of a deal. We still have the best player in the NBA and even a mediocre coach can figue out how to win with him.
I'd imagine that since Mike Brown opted to not speak during timeouts this year
and delegate responsibility to all his ‘coordinators’, it wasn’t Mike Brown. Brown made no adjustments in the postseason than to say at halftime ‘Lebron, go create’.
by Hardcore Legend on Jul 8, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Is Kuester really that irreplaceable? I really would like Mike Brown to have an “offensive coordinator”, but is Kuester the be-all end-all guy for that?
i don’t think anyone is saying he’s irreplaceable. it’s just a shame that after a year in which the offense really improved, and kuester was in charge, he bails. especially to an in-division rival.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 8, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
‘…ESPECIALLY TO AN IN-DIVISION RIVAL.’ Key words.
by johnnyphoenix on Jul 8, 2009 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Detroit isn't going anywhere soon
Especially not with that roster. Who is starting at center? Maxiell? Kwame? They’ll probably improve on last year, but not that much.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
Offseason's not over
There’s still plenty of moves that can be made to shore up the center position, if it is indeed Kwame, it can’t be that bad. We don’t need anymore scoring, and Kwame brings a big body that can bang around and play solid defense. It’s all up to Villanueva’s ability to defend.
We didn't lose the games, we just ran out of time -- Bobby Layne
People forget
That Kwame started 30 games last year, so it’s not like Kwame’s never started a game in his life in Detroit.
We didn't lose the games, we just ran out of time -- Bobby Layne
it’s more like kwame’s never started a game and been good in his detroit, or any other professional, life.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jul 9, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Yea
and he has hands of stone. Kwame is a terrible excuse for a NBA player. If you holding out hope he will help your team then you are sadly mistaken and seriously misinformed.
Baseball is God's sport! All Truth Goes Through Three Stages 1.It is ridiculed 2.It is violently opposed 3.Finally, it is accepted as self-evident. kinesiologist
by E5 on Jul 9, 2009 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
As I said before
We have enough offense on the roster, we don’t need Kwame to catch anything with his “hands of stone”. As long as he rebounds and defends he’ll do just fine.
We didn't lose the games, we just ran out of time -- Bobby Layne
Plenty of moves?
Only thing I see is trading Rip and Prince to Dallas for Dampier and filler or signing Nesterovic, neither of which is that significant of an upgrade (and the fact I’m indicating that it’s an upgrade is telling).
Kwame is an okay backup center, but he’s downright awful if you’re going to play him over 30 minutes a night. I’m not saying Detroit isn’t going to improve from last year, as I can’t see how Kuester can’t win over 40 games with that roster. You’re not going anywhere with such a gaping hole at center though.
To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
Gordon just about pushed the Boston game to 7 games by himself. He was excellent in the postseason averaging almost 25 pts a game. He really stepped up his game in that Boston series. Keep Cleveland the same without Shaq, add Gordon and I think that puts Cleveland over the top in the same manner adding Shaq does.
there is no doubt that gordon was excellent in the boston series, but 7 games is too small of a sample to make meaningful conclusions about a player. the guy is good, but he’s never sniffed an all-star game or an all-nba team. let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
if we’re going to get specific about cleveland, it just isn’t true that gordon adds to the cavs in the same manner that shaq does. adding gordon gives us more of the same — an undersized combo guard that needs the ball in his hands — except with worse defense. mo williams’ numbers are better across the board than gordon’s (PER, TS%, ORtg, DRtg, Win Shares and WARP), and delonte west’s are close enough (significantly better in DRtg, most importantly, and $7mm cheaper) that adding gordon would do little to change the cleveland dynamic. in fact, gordon’s defensive numbers are bad enough that he might even detract from the current cavs’ win expectancy.
shaq, on the other hand, addresses a major area of need — for the cavs and much of the league. a legitimate post threat, both offensively and defensively. shaq’s addition makes cleveland a different and better team…gordon wouldn’t have helped much.














