Game # 4 - Cavaliers 121-Chicago 98 - Sunday Sweetness
Any thoughts that the Cavaliers might have been shaken by their narrow loss on Thursday night in Game Three and would have to struggle to regain firm control of their first-round series with Chicago lasted about 18 minutes of game time today at the United Center, and then, to use a cliche, it was if a switch was flipped, and Cleveland rode a revitalized defensive effort, a quietly huge game from Antawn Jamison, a key contribution from J.J. Hickson, production up and down the line-up, and, especially, a triple double from LeBron James, to overwhelm the Bulls 121-98. The victory leaves the Cavs on the cusp of advancing to the next round, a deal they will try to seal on Tuesday night back in Cleveland.
The first quarter began with Cleveland seemingly determined to establish the three, as they quickly made six attempts, but converted only one in the game's opening minutes. Chicago, meanwhile, used the trio of Derrick Rose, Joakim Noah, and Luol Deng to stay close, and in fact led by four at 14-10 when Shaquille O'Neal picked up his second foul and went to the bench. Anderson Varejao checked in and at that moment the Cavs went on a 9-0 run to grab a five-point lead, then treaded water with the Bulls the rest of the low-scoring quarter, and the first twelve minutes ended with Cleveland up, 24-21. Chicago had established a commanding rebounding edge of 16-9 in the quarter, which helped them to stay right with the Cavs despite shooting only 32% from the field. Cleveland had also made only half of their six foul shots in the opening stanza, a figure that was to get much worse before shockingly turning around later. Noah's 9 boards supported Deng's 8 points, and Rose's six, while Anthony Parker chipped in with seven to lead the Cavs.
LeBron James went to the locker room between quarters, and the best immediate news was that he was walking fine, and thus there was no problem with his legs. It turned out that his elbow was a little sore, but by the time he normally would have checked back in anyhow, he had returned to the bench and was ready to go...any lingering soreness was transmitted to the Bulls as the game went on.
The second quarter began with J.J on the floor, a welcome sight for many Cavs fans, and they would be rewarded with a fine effort from Hickson. But after the Cavs had again bumped the lead back to five, at 32-27, Chicago mounted a run, and at around the halfway mark of the quarter, the Bulls had retaken the lead at 41-37 Then James ignited a comeback with a three, added another three shortly thereafter, the defense picked up the intensity and cut off the inside to the Bulls (including one memorable sequence of suffocating D by James on Deng), and a 25-11 spurt to end the half had the Cavs sitting pretty at the break, 62-52, which ended with a nice LeBron jump-shot to beat the halftime buzzer.
A key turnaround during the second quarter was that it ended with the Cavaliers having made their last eight free throws after beginning the game an abysmal five of thirteen, We all know that shots from the charity stripe have been an issue at times, including just three days ago, and the turnaround came at an opportune time.
At the half, LeBron led the Cavs with 17 points and seven rebounds, and Antawn Jamison , Anthony Parker and Mo Williams had pitched in another 30 points between them. For the Bulls, Rose led three players in double figures with 15, and Noah had thirteen rebounds, to keep the game from already being a rout. But the tide had turned, and the beginning of the third quarter saw it become a flood.
Straight out of the locker room, Derrick Rose came up limping after landing awkwardly on Shaq's foot, and although he remained in the game after a timeout, it seemed to slow his driving for the rest of the game, during which he added just six more points. Helped by Jamison's 13 points in the quarter, the Cavaliers quickly pushed their lead out to 21 points on a three from Mo Williams, and unlike the comeback the Cavs made from an identical deficit on Thursday night, the Bulls, with a quarter and a half to go, were done. The rest of the third consisted of Cleveland maintaining the same basic advantage, and a long LeBron 3-pointer at the buzzer to end the quarter extended the lead to 99-76. and gave the Cavaliers 75 points in the middle quarters.
All that remained in the fourth quarter was trying to get LeBron one more rebound to secure his triple double. He might not have got the chance, but the Cavs came out and went scoreless for the first nearly three minutes. In came James, and almost immediately he garnered his board, and added a couple of smooth-as-silk threes before finally retiring to the bench with 37 points, including six of nine on 3-pointers.
Five Cavaliers finished in double figures, including Jamison's 24, and Mo Williams' 19. J.J Hickson added 10, including four of four at the line, and Anthony Parker finished with 12. Shaq, though saddled with foul trouble much of the game, finished with six points and seven rebounds, and was much more of a force inside than he had been at any time since Game One.
Joakim Noah shared the Bulls' scoring lead with Rose, finishing with 21, and also added twenty rebounds. Five Bulls also finished in double figures, and Chicago won the rebounding battle, 49-41, including seventeen on the offensive end, but in the end, what the Bulls brought to the table this Sunday left them hungry and wanting.
On to Tuesday night we go, back to the Q in Noah's favorite city. If it is anything like today was, it should be a fun show to watch.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well if the Mavs cant win it this year I hope the Magic win it…
… anything but the Spurs, Lakers, or Cavs
by ap3604 on Apr 25, 2010 9:50 PM EDT reply actions
Go Cavs?
It would seem to me, that you feel threatened by the Eric Ghiaciuc acquisition.
by johnnyphoenix on Apr 26, 2010 2:13 AM CDT up reply actions
So great to see periods of
sustained crushing defense! Missed it. Glad that puppy found its way home!
I'm Polish...what's your excuse?
It was much, much better today, Juannieboy, not only did we help force 12 Bulls turnovers, we held Chicago to 37% shooting for the game. The intensity showed in LeBron’s eyes throughout the game, and it seemed to radiate through the entire team,
by AncientMariner on Apr 25, 2010 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions
"Intensity" is exactly right!
There is no way that the Cavaliers were going to let Game 4 slip away. From the middle of the 2nd quarter until the end of the game, it felt like a steamroller hurtling down Granger Road hill!
by BrownsCavaliersIndiansForev on Apr 25, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions
good thing LeBron is taking on the job of head coach as well…2 games ago he made the decision to defend Rose, and after that game was instrumental in getting JJ back on the floor…if the Cavs let him coach, then they won’t have anything to worry about…but if they let Mike Brown coach, they will keep losing the mismatch battle…
Standard MB hate mail.
Let’s see. The Cleveland defense was stifling during the game. The defense that MB teaches and coaches all year. Every player did his job defensively. But of course the coach gets no credit for having his team prepared to perform on a competitor’s court.
I take nothing from LBJ’s attitude, decisions, and performance on the court. But I won’t take away from a good coach doing a good job during the play-offs either.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Apr 26, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions
I could not possibly agree with you more, Lebron is coaching this team. Lebron told Brown to play JJ more. Lebron also draws up the plays at the end of games (even Brown admits that one). It’s baffling that JJ played so well all season and then Brown decides to shelve him for the post season. We match up so much better against many teams when we go small. This team is so talented, but I fear us getting out-coached and losing a series.
by NW Engineer on Apr 26, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't know whose decision it was
to bring LBJ back in the 4th when the cavs were scorless for a stretch and the defense was letting up, but that great. That to me just sent the message that the Cavs will not be satisfied having a big lead, but will only be satisfied by having complete dominance.
I’m glad they lost one though. Keeps them grounded, and it always nice for a team and the fans to win aseries on your home court.
CAVS 2010 NBA Champions
Amazing CAVS 2010 Anthem by some of CLE’s finest! ENJOY!
Defense and JJ
Good to have you back. Icing on the cake: a special cameo from DGibs.
O Hai Thar!
Addicted to 4chan/chan4chan. Seeking halp.
chan4chan + Cavaliers basketball > Girls + Smex
JJ
Glad to see him get some burn.
"Just to remind you, Orlando made it to the finals last year without this guy. Crazy."~John Krolik
Until I read this blog, I never knew that a PF that this year ranked 75th in rebound rate (just ahead of this guy), 119th in PER (8 spots below Hakim Warrick), and is so bad on defense that his inefficiencies are used to support the argument of a teammates’ defensive prowess and can only get 21 MPG ….is the next-coming of a young Shawn Kemp.
You talking about Hickson?
It would seem to me, that you feel threatened by the Eric Ghiaciuc acquisition.
by johnnyphoenix on Apr 26, 2010 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I’m not sure what “2 random comments” to which you are referring, but this was not in response to that, rather the reverence for which most speak of this PF. It’s a shame some of these people are not in a position of influence with the Cavs so that they could begin to understand the importance of this PF.
What difference does it make how many comments there are? And I assume you are referring to Hickson? Why do you insist on not referring to him by name?
It would seem to me, that you feel threatened by the Eric Ghiaciuc acquisition.
by johnnyphoenix on Apr 26, 2010 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Comment
fail. And you only needed one comment to do it.
by navycavsfan on Apr 26, 2010 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry, new to this website and was unaware of Rule #1. Nothing bad can be said about the immortal J.J. HICKSON
And learn how to use the reply button, you jackass
"You are an LGT success story" -- Jay
by Turkmenbashi on Apr 27, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions
What...exactly...is your point?
Hickson being over-rated here? Being concise and to the point would help. Unlike other SB Nation sites , FTS is tolerent of different points of view and don’t mind a troll with a valid point for discussion. Suggest you try being less cryptic.
I'm Polish...what's your excuse?
Rule #1 is actually Don’t be an asshole. Now you are aware.
No one said Hickson is a complete player or doesn’t have his flaws. He’s young and experiencing his first real minutes this year..and he has shown a lot of potential. He fits very well into the cavs system and with the personnel they have, that’s really all people are saying. Sure you can criticize Hickson, plenty of people on this blog do, but I highly doubt your motives here. Are you just breaking down Hickson’s game? Your post was pretty sarcastic and condescending towards people on this blog (or at least their ability to guage talent), so it’s not surprising people didn’t respond in glowing terms. Don’t make this into people didn’t like my post b/c ‘I said something negative about a cavs player.’ People will hear you out if you check the attitude you came in with.
It would seem to me, that you feel threatened by the Eric Ghiaciuc acquisition.
by johnnyphoenix on Apr 27, 2010 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Ha, no one claims Hickson is immortal. What we all were complaining about in games 1-3, was how he wasn’t be used at all (and no 30 seconds at the end of quarters 1 and 3 don’t mean anything).
During the season, he showed decent skills at running the pick and roll with LeBron. His energy alongside Varajeo seemed to give some trouble to opposing players. And we saw how quick Noah and Gibson were beating Shaq/Z. We wanted a quicker player in there to harass them. None of were claiming he’d score 25 points or pull in 15 rebounds. We just wanted a different look and rotation, which is what we got in Game 4. Am hoping Brown continues to use him like this the rest of the playoffs.
I’ve been reading this blog for a while and while I may have exaggerated a little, I’m amazed by how many people are completely infatuated w/ JJ. All I ever read about are the positives and flashy things that fans can easily spot and that catch the eye. Things like his athleticism, length, hops, and the fact that he can bang. But, isn’t it possible that there’s a little bit of cognitive bias going on. That maybe he does things to catch our eye but perhaps there exists reasons MB (as well as the rest of the coaching staff) limits his minutes? Maybe we could give just a little deference to MB . For all his faults, he has done a hell of a job delegating (Mike Malone practically draws up every timeout set), and he knows his stuff on defense as well as any coach in the league. Instead of giving him any credit, people routinely credit the Cavs in spite of him (even crediting the "intensity in LBJ’s eyes"…really??). Then again, the way some people describe him, I guess MB is an idiot for failing a play someone so supremely talented as JJ. No one ever discusses the fact that JJ is a below-average rebounder at best, he still looks lost defending the high screen (how many times does he hard-hedge when he should soft-hedge? And vice-versa!), constantly fails to show on pin-downs (and when he does he never retreats in time to make 2 plays), and is typically troubled grasping off-ball rotations and responsibilities. One metric had him as the 3rd worst defensive player of all that qualified! MB’s defense is as complex as any in the League, especially the multiple ways they defend the high screen (both on and off the ball) and if JJ can’t handle these things, then MB and his staff are probably justified in limiting his minutes (regardless of how athletic he is and how good he looks running around), especially in this series where the Cavs are currently up 3-1 (after completely suffocating the Bulls in gm4) and with Shaq’s impending importance in rounds 2-4. Sure, JJ played pretty well throughout the season and even started some games (as many posters routinely bring up), but aside from our own cognitive bias’ the numbers show what he is: a young, athletic, but merely average PF offensively and a well-below average defender. Hell, his 2 year adjsuted +/- is BY FAR the worst out of all that qualify….ok, that was long, but there’s your answer
I agree 100% with everything talonk said. I also agree with Scalia, Mike Brown is a very good coach. But he is not PERFECT so sometimes we fans will have complaints, and in this case my fear is that Brown’s flaws could cost us a ring.
Versus the Bulls it was clear that we should go with a quicker, more athletic rotation. Why did it take Brown THREE GAMES to make an adjustment? I would expect a coach to figure this out after 1 game (or after a half). If we don’t adjust quick enough it could cost us a series later in the playoffs. We have the luxury of having a deep team with the flexibility to match up small or big, score inside or outside, etc. My criticism of Brown is that he doesn’t utilize this luxury and he is too slow to make adjustments.
Look at how we played all season after the ’Twan trade with Z and Shaq out. Why would you mess with that?
by NW Engineer on Apr 27, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Not to detract from what you wrote, you make some great points.
But the majority of the minutes JJ did play as a starter this year was as a center. He was playing out of position for most of that time against other centers in the league. If his defense was nearly as poorly as you have described it, I doubt he would have played as many minutes as he did during the regular season.
Do I think he is excellent? Not yet. But he does have a chance to be above average, but it will take another season or two (or more).
Anyways, what I had a problem with your original post is that you created your id just to log on and bash JJ. All of your links in the original post are from other sites, not this one. Based on the way you created an id, and then started bashing, seemed very troll-like; I apologize if I overreacted. If you truly are a Cavs fan, and just now decided to get involved, welcome to the blog. We look forward to having more detailed discussions (like this post, rather than the first one). We enjoy discussion here, not ESPN type message board bashings.
Okay Scalia, you have shown an ability to rebound, and you have scored three or four points here, and since you only recently created your account, I think it’s fair to say that you have come in off the bench and contributed.
However, if someone does not agree with you, that does not make them necessarily wrong, or right, it simply means that they are entitled to their opinion, as much as you are entitled to yours. Calling J.J “The Immortal” might just get some play sometime down the road…might work to have a montage of his plays with “My Immortal” from Evanescence as background music (lol).
by AncientMariner on Apr 27, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Okay Scalia, you have shown an ability to rebound, and you have scored three or four points here, and since you only recently created your account, I think it’s fair to say that you have come in off the bench and contributed.
If you added that I play defense with my head up my ass I’d change my name to JJ
/rimshot
//too soon?
However, if someone does not agree with you, that does not make them necessarily wrong, or right,
Well, MB’s opinions are much more educated than all of ours, yet many still think he is wrong.
I’m simply trying to bring a different side to the JJ argument, one that doesn’t get a lot of play. He does so many visually-stimulating and “athletic” things(i.e. this) that perhaps we’re all a little blinded.

by 















