/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55540895/695348808.0.jpg)
LeBron James is questioning why there’s a cap on player salary and he’s citing Stephen Curry’s value to the Warriors in his argument.
James tweeted Saturday, “So tell me again why there’s a cap on how much a player should get?? Don’t answer that. Steph should be getting 400M this summer 5yrs. #JMTs” in response to a tweet about how Curry increased the Warriors’ franchise value.
So tell me again why there's a cap on how much a player should get?? Don't answer that. Steph should be getting 400M this summer 5yrs. #JMTs https://t.co/jMYfI0umWK
— LeBron James (@KingJames) July 1, 2017
James also tweeted congrats to Curry on his deal.
Congrats @StephenCurry30!! https://t.co/hBpxVhAEBQ
— LeBron James (@KingJames) July 1, 2017
What James is talking at here is abolishing the max contract. Curry just agreed to a five-year, $201 million deal with the Warriors, which is the largest deal in league history.
James, though, has a point. Stars like him, Curry and Russell Westbrook - and many, many others - are the reason why the NBA is more popular than ever. The max contract is really a limit on player earnings, and limiting what players are actually worth. James, for instance, could ask for $50 million a year and a team would pay him. He’s worth that, and probably more.
James, down the line, could have a major role in changing this. He’s the vice president of the NBA’s Players Association and he could help the NBAPA make a push for this during the next CBA negotiations. In time, this could be more than a tweet.